Skip to main content

Some quick notes on Dark Mode


The dark mode, perhaps is one of the easiest functionality to implement without breaking literally anything in existing project. However, it has it's own hidden costs, tricks. Before implementing the Dark mode, what is most important is that your project must be ready for dark mode.

What I had:


What I wanted to achieve:


The setup:
 The only thing you need to do to get your app ready for dark mode is the themes tag and the AppCompatDelegate class. The rest depends on your project. So instead of some <style name="AppTheme" parent="Theme.AppCompat.Light.DarkActionBar"> you just need the <style name="AppTheme" parent="Theme.AppCompat.DayNight"> . The code for dark mode/light mode is pretty simple: 

 
Note: These are not the only states. 

The problems I faced:

The drawer:
 First of all,  if you notice the drawer on the Light mode, you will see that the text of the menu items, is black. I don't really want that, because in dark mode it will truly suck. Since you cannot change it from xml, here is what you can do for it:

 Custom inserted colors:
There is two options in this part of the problem. Well, my background colors or my text colors had a color set by the xml and not by the theme. So what you can do here is choose colors that don't really affect the visibility on theme change, or leave Androids default.

Since I am using a single Activity and making these changes in the activity (because the drawer is located there) there is no more need to handle things in fragments (except when having to replace an icon depending on the theme).

The toolbar:
Yes. We should be careful with the toolbar. Once you implement the dark theme, you may not want your toolbar to have a black text as well. So you just change it's behavior to:

The savedInstanceState.
One mistake I used to make during my implementation was that I tried to recreate() the activity in order for the onSavedInstanceState to be called. No need for that, once you call AppCompatDelegate.setDefaultNightMode(AppCompatDelegate.WHATEVER_MODE) the activity will recreate for you. Once the activity is recreated, in your onCreate method you can check for the drawer or toolbar as discussed above.

Is there a better approach?
Perhaps yes. You may try to code all this from the theme tag on the styles.xml. But since xml is not my thing,  I chose this approach.

Hope I helped. Full project on Github.

Popular posts from this blog

What I learned from Kotlin Flow API

I used to check the docs and just read a lot about flows but didn't implement anything until yesterday. However, the API tasted really cool (even though some operations are still in Experimental state).Prerequisites: If you don't know RxJava it's fine. But a RxJava recognizer would read this faster.Cold vs Hot streamsWell, I really struggled with this concept because it is a little bit tricky. The main difference between cold and hot happened to be pretty simple: Hot streams produce when you don't care while in cold streams, if you don't collect() (or RxJava-s equivalent subscribe()) the stream won't be activated at all. So, Flows are what we call cold streams. Removing the subscriber will not produce data at all, making the Flows one of the most sophisticated asynchronous stream API ever (in the JVM world). I tried to make a illustration of hot and cold streams: Since I mentioned the word asynchronous this implies that they do support coroutines also. Flows vs…

Modularizing your Android app, breaking the monolith (Part 1)

Inspired by a Martin Fowlers post about Micro Frontends, I decided to break my monolithic app into a modular app. I tried to read a little more about breaking monolithic apps in Android, and as far as I got, I felt confident to share my experience with you. This will be some series of blog posts where we actually try to break a simple app into a modularized Android app.

Note: You should know that I am no expert in this, so if there are false statements or mistakes please feel free to criticize, for the sake of a better development. 

What do you benefit from this approach:
Well, people are moving pretty fast nowadays and delivery is required faster and faster. So, in order to achieve this, modularising Android apps is really necessary.You can share features across different apps. Independent teams and less problems per each.Conditional features update.Quicker debugging and fixing.A feature delay doesn't delay the whole app. As per writing tests, there is not too much difference about…

From Gson to Moshi, what I learned

There is no doubt that people are getting away from GSON and I agree with those reasons too. The only advantage GSON has over other parsing libraries is that it takes a really short amount of time to set up. Furthermore, the most important thing is that Moshi is embracing Kotlin support.

First let's implement the dependency:
implementation("com.squareup.moshi:moshi:1.8.0") It's not a struggle to migrate to Moshi. It's really Gson look-a-like. The only thing to do is annotate the object with @field:Json instead of @SerializedName (which is Gsons way for JS representation):

data class User( //GSON way @SerializedName("name") val name: String, @SerializedName("user_name") val userName: String, @SerializedName("last_name") val lastName: String, @SerializedName("email") val email: String ) data class User( //Moshi way @field:Json(name = "name") val name: String, @field:Json(name = "user_name…